The Nine Elements of Existence

Master Ontology: Ontology of Existence

© 2025–2026 Falian Wanlin. All rights reserved. This is original content. Quotation is welcome provided that the source and link are clearly acknowledged. Full reproduction and commercial use without authorization are prohibited.

To say that something has existed is not merely to report a feeling or repeat a private conviction. It is to make a claim that must be able to stand.

In this ontology, existence is not treated as a vague impression or a convenient habit of speech. It must be determinable. If something is to count as existent, it must be capable of appearing, being distinguished, leaving trace, and entering the order of what has actually occurred. Where none of these conditions can be met, what remains is not established existence but concept, impression, or assertion.

For that reason, I propose The Nine Elements of Existence as the minimal structure by which existence may be established.

These nine elements are neither rhetorical decoration nor an arbitrary list. They mark the minimum conditions under which existence can meaningfully be said to hold. Remove any one of them, and the claim loses stability at its base.

1. Time

Existence unfolds in time.

Without time, nothing happens. There is no sequence, no change, no before and after. Nothing can arise, endure, or pass away.

Even the briefest event must pass through some interval, however slight. Without temporal passage, there is no occurrence to distinguish from non-occurrence. There is no experience, no record, and no history.

Time, then, is not an added feature of existence. It is one of its primary conditions.

2. Space

Existence requires a field in which it can appear.

Without space, nothing can present itself, be located, or be distinguished. There is no site at which anything may manifest.

Space does not refer only to visible physical extension. It may also mean any field within which manifestation becomes possible. The point is simple: existence cannot remain nowhere. If it is to be established at all, it must appear within some field.

Without such a field, there is no basis for observation, distinction, or determination.

3. Position

Existence must occur at a definite point of time and space.

Time by itself is too indeterminate. Space by itself is too indeterminate. For something to count as having existed in an actual rather than merely abstract sense, it must be situated. It must answer the question of when and where.

Position is what gives existence the character of an event. Once time and space meet in a definite coordinate, existence becomes traceable as an occurrence rather than left suspended as a possibility.

4. Trace

What occurs leaves trace.

The form of that trace may vary. It may be physical, informational, structural, or something else. Its scale may be large or minute. None of that changes the principle. If something has entered the history of the universe, it does not leave behind absolute nothing.

Trace is what makes existence available to determination. Without trace, the claim that something occurred cannot be sustained.

5. Duration

Existence requires at least minimal extension.

Zero duration is zero existence.

This is not the same as time in general. Time names the condition within which existence may unfold. Duration asks whether anything extends long enough to count as an occurrence.

If something has no interval, no passage, no minimal persistence, then it cannot form an event. It cannot be experienced, traced, or distinguished as having been.

A zero-duration “event” may function as a conceptual abstraction. It does not constitute actual being.

6. Irreversibility

Once something has occurred, it cannot be restored to the state of never having occurred.

This marks a basic boundary between the real and the simulated. A real event may be concealed, denied, minimized, or overwritten in appearance, but it cannot be returned to absolute non-occurrence.

To exist is to alter the order of what has been. Once that alteration has taken place, history is no longer what it was before.

Irreversibility is not a secondary consequence. It belongs to the structure of real occurrence itself.

7. Impact

To exist is to make some difference.

That difference may be large or small, immediate or delayed, obvious or difficult to detect. It may appear in physical form, in information, in relation, or in perception. The scale is not the point.

What matters is simpler than that. Real existence is not null in effect. If something makes no defensible difference of any kind, then there is no sufficient ground for saying that it exists.

Impact does not need to be dramatic. But it cannot be absolutely zero.

8. Relationality

Nothing can be established as existing in total isolation from everything else.

For an existent to be determinable, it must stand in some relation to what is not itself. That relation may take the form of contact, observation, influence, comparison, or causal connection.

This does not mean that everything must be broadly or densely connected. It means only that absolute severance from all relation would also sever the conditions under which existence could be established in the first place.

What exists is distinguishable not only in itself, but also through the relations in which it stands.

9. Identifiability

For existence to be established, something must be distinguishable as this event or this entity.

If it cannot be identified in any way, then it cannot be separated from undifferentiated abstraction. It remains a blur rather than an existent.

Identifiability does not depend on prior naming. What it requires is distinguishability. Something must be markable as this rather than that, this occurrence rather than another, this being rather than an unformed generality.

Without that, it cannot be traced.
And without trace, it cannot be established as an independent existent.

Conclusion

Existence is not secured by sentiment, assertion, or conceptual convenience. It stands only where its conditions can be met.

Anything that is to be established as existing must satisfy at least nine basic conditions: Time, Space, Position, Trace, Duration, Irreversibility, Impact, Relationality, and Identifiability.

Taken together, these nine elements form the minimal framework within which existence can be said to hold. They mark the difference between what may be established as real and what remains only imagined, asserted, or conceptually named.

If something cannot pass through these nine conditions, then its existential status remains unestablished and must be questioned again.

The task of ontology is to say, as clearly as possible, what must be present for existence to hold at all.

Soul, Freedom, Rules, and Causality

A Preface to Soul Theory

Soul, Freedom, Rules, and Causality

A Preface to Soul Theory

© 2025–2026 Falian Wanlin. All rights reserved. This is original content. Quotation is welcome provided that the source and link are clearly acknowledged. Full reproduction and commercial use without authorization is prohibited.

A Reflection on How the Universe Works

I keep returning to one question:

If souls truly exist in the universe, why do they enter life?

In my view, souls may come from a shared source.
What that source really is, I do not know.

It may be something like a spring, an energy source that continuously gives rise to souls.

All souls that emerge from that source should, in essence, be equal.

A soul has no gender, no size, and no built in hierarchy.
A soul attached to a human being is not inherently more noble than one attached to an insect.

The vessel may differ, but the soul itself should be of the same nature.

This is also one way I understand the idea that all beings are equal.

Soul and Life

To me, life and soul are not exactly the same thing.

Where there is life, there is usually a soul.
But where there is a soul, there is not always biological life.

Some states of existence may contain only the soul, without a biological form of life.
Certain realms mentioned in Buddhist scripture, such as hell or the hungry ghost realm, may belong to this kind of state.

Life is only a vessel.

A soul can pass through different vessels and take on different roles.
In the human world it plays one role. In the animal world it plays another.

Each reincarnation is like a new stage of experience.

The Universe as a Field of Experience

If souls come from a common source, then once they leave that source, they may move through many different environments in the universe.

I tend to think of the universe as a field of experience.

Our solar system may be only one hidden realm among countless life bearing domains in the cosmos.
As far as we currently know, Earth is the only confirmed place where life exists, which may mean that the entire solar system forms a single life system.

Yet Buddhist scripture speaks of “three thousand great thousand worlds,” suggesting that the universe contains innumerable worlds.

Earth is only a small stage.

Freedom and Rules

If the soul possesses freedom, then another question follows:

Can freedom exist without any limits?

My answer is no.

Freedom without rules is dangerous.

If every being could act however it wished, the universe would quickly fall into disorder.
Actions that harm others and actions that destroy balance would spread without restraint.

For that reason, the universe likely already contains certain fundamental rules.

Once the soul leaves its source, it enters a universe governed by rules.

The First Choice

Within this line of thought, the earliest choice the soul faces may not be whether to exist.

It may instead be this:

Whether to follow the rules and make choices within freedom.

Freedom still exists, but it must operate within rules.

Causality

Once the soul makes a choice, consequences begin to unfold.

In my view, many things can be understood through one simple chain:

Choice → Karma → Cause → Karmic System → Destiny → Result

This is what I call the Falian Causal Seed Model.

Within this model, causality is not a religious slogan meant to encourage people to behave well.
It is a law of how life operates.

Freedom without rules produces risk, and risk accumulates into cause.
When conditions ripen, cause becomes result.

Formation, Stability, Decline, and Emptiness

Buddhism also offers a structural view of how worlds move:

Formation
Stability
Decline
Emptiness

A world comes into being, endures for a time, begins to decay, and eventually returns to emptiness.

This is a cycle.

It also resonates with the observation that when things reach an extreme, they begin to reverse.

Once something develops to its furthest point, it starts moving in the opposite direction.

The Dharma Decline Age and the Seven National Calamities

Buddhist scripture also speaks of the Dharma Decline Age and the Seven National Calamities.

If these descriptions reflect part of the laws of the universe, then certain disasters and periods of turmoil may simply be one phase in a larger historical cycle.

But as long as events have not reached their final stage, it is difficult to make absolute claims.

So even when signs of decline appear in the world, it is still too early to declare the ending.

The appearance of decay does not mean the final outcome has already been fixed.

Return

Buddhist teaching speaks of nirvana.

Shakyamuni Buddha said that he returned to nirvana.

If souls truly come from some source, then the end of reincarnation may be a return.

The soul leaves its source, moves through different roles and forms of life across the universe, and in the end returns to where it began.

Whether that source is the same as nirvana is still difficult to determine.

Both possibilities remain open.

Conclusion

These reflections are still part of an ongoing exploration.

I do not know the final answer to the universe.

But at least from where I stand now, I am inclined to believe this:

The universe has rules.
The soul possesses freedom.
And every result follows from the causality set in motion by choice.

Note

The following is the original scriptural passage on the Seven National Calamities from the Medicine Buddha Sutra:

“When consecrated Kshatriya kings encounter disasters, these may include epidemics among the people, invasion from foreign lands, rebellion within their own realm, strange disturbances among the stars, eclipses of the sun and moon, storms and rains arriving out of season, and drought when rain should come.”